BC-0039 · CORE GUIDE
Editorial review 2026-09-26
Roblox Build Workflow Checklist
Use a creation checklist with recorded evidence at each handoff: access, a bounded brief, an inspected interaction, reliable retry and a deliberate sharing or publication decision. Leave a check unresolved when you have not observed its result.
Objective
Maintain a creation checklist that records observations and blocks unsupported handoffs.
Before you start
- Identify the account, device and candidate version without collecting sensitive credentials.
- Keep the intended loop and its boundaries written down.
- Use explicit not-checked states instead of preselected completion marks.
Steps
- Record whether the intended creation workflow is actually reachable.
- Save a brief with action, feedback, ending and retry expectations.
- Inspect the primary interaction and record its outcome.
- Check a meaningful failure and the reset state after progress has changed.
- Record focused revisions and repeat affected checks.
- Choose the next handoff—further iteration, available sharing or deliberate publication—and verify its separate requirements.
Verification
- Completed rows contain a concrete observation or reviewed decision.
- Unobserved states remain not checked rather than silently becoming successful.
- The checklist distinguishes requested behavior from generated behavior.
- Version changes trigger relevant retesting instead of inheriting old passes.
- Publication or sharing status is not inferred solely from gameplay success.
Limitations
- This editorial checklist does not inspect your account or test a game automatically.
- Completing it does not certify policy compliance or guarantee approval.
- Specialized projects need additional checks for their actual mechanics and delivery risks.
Working notes
The checklist is a record you complete, not a remote eligibility test. Start by noting whether you reached the creation workflow on the intended account and device. If access remains unresolved, preserve that observation and handle it separately instead of marking the requirement met because a guide lists your country or operating system.
Keep the creative brief and the gameplay observations beside each other. A prompt can ask for a clear goal and retry behavior without the generated result delivering both. Each inspection item should refer to a visible action and outcome rather than the fact that the request was sent.
Add a stop reason wherever continuing would hide uncertainty. If retry leaves stale state, fix or record it before comparing later attempts. If a sharing control is absent, do not replace that observation with an assumed private test. Publication and audience checks belong at their own handoff.
Date your observations when you make them and identify the version. Reusing a checklist after a substantial edit should trigger the relevant checks again. A previously completed row is useful history, not a permanent pass for every later version.
Examples
- Access row: intended account and device—record locally; creation entry—present, absent or not checked; blocking screen—record visible wording; next action—continue to the brief or use the matching access guide. Do not add passwords or identity documents.
- Gameplay row: action—collect parcel and reach depot; expected—visible completion; observed—fill after inspection; retry—record restored starting state; decision—continue, repair or investigate. A blank observation is not a pass.
- Release row: candidate version—identify; listing matches implemented loop—record review; audience requirements—consult current guidance; player-facing version—inspect after publication where legitimately accessible. Keep editor observations separate from the published result.
Common questions
- Can I reuse the same checklist after editing?
- Yes, as a record format. Retain earlier observations as history, but repeat the checks affected by the edit and attach the new observations to the correct version.